Nyasaland is at the centre of a 5 acre parcel of land to the west of Crondall Road, north of the canal and opposite the Exchequer public house. It is outside the village settlement boundary in the open countryside and classed as agricultural land although not currently in agricultural use. The two barn structures on the site were not used as barns, and may have been built without permission. The previous owner was granted temporary permission to site a mobile home on the land to house a worker associated with the agricultural use of the land. An application to extend the temporary permission was refused in 2006, but the refusal was not enforced.
Chartfield Homes are developing options for new proposals, which may include conversion of the barns to houses, a detached house on the site of the mobile home and / or a possible alternative proposal for further homes fronting on to Crondall Road. They are also suggesting other potential outcomes for this land if their proposals were not to proceed.
Full planning applications for development of the site are subject to a full public consultation and be considered on its merits against a number of planning factors, including
- the very principle of development on the site
- Hart's housing need
- the status of the land as countryside
- compliance with the Hart Local Plan 2020
- compliance with the Crookham Village Neighbourhood Plan,
- consideration of the impact on the neighbouring Conservation Areas,
- effect on the SPA (Special Protection Area) and availability of SANG (suitable alternative natural greenspace),
- access arrangements and highway works
- contamination on the site,
- approval by Hart of the proposals.
June 2024
Yet more planning applications have been submitted for Nyasaland and are currently in progress.
FACE IT's response has been submitted, the key points of which are summarised below:
FACE IT objects to both of these applications for the reasons explained below.
No Existing Dwelling
These applications are for extensions to an existing dwelling, both outwards and upwards. But there is no existing dwelling, as the caravan that was used as a temporary dwelling previously on the site has been demolished by the site owner.
Site Location
We note that the 'Block Plan' for both applications shows an approximate location of a portacabin.
It is not clear on what legal or planning basis the TWO portacabins now on the site, at least one of which appears to be permanently occupied, have been erected but no planning information appears to be available about how they were allowed to be there.
The application provides location and elevations of an 'existing' portakabin but these do not prove that the 'existing' portakabin (whichever one is being referred to) are in the same location or to the same footprint, size and orientation of the previous caravan which has now been demolished.
Evidence in the FACE IT Response to Hart District Planning Application 21/01725/FUL clearly shows the derelict remains of the previous caravan but Hart would need to be satisfied that the application relates to a building in the same location as the previous caravan to which any concession by Hart of Previously Developed Land (PDL) or a previously existing 'dwelling' may have related.
Site is not PDL
The question of this site, curtilage and PDL was raised and discussed at length with Planning inspector A Walker at the appeals hearing on 17 October 2023 for applications 22/02794/OUT and 22/01510/FUL (Appeal Decisions report for appeals APP/N1730/W/23/3325419 and APP/N1730/W/23/3318602 resulting in the Inspector's report dd 17 November 2023.
We note that the site in this application again includes the entirety of the field. Again the large area of land included within the application is well outside the footprint of the old caravan that used to be on the site.
It is clear from the Inspector's decision (cf. para 17) that "not all of the site falls within the curtilage of the [previous] dwelling. Indeed, little, if any, of the land beyond its footprint is considered to be its curtilage and that the dwelling forms a very small part of the site."
Cannot Extend a Non-Existent Building
We also note from the report that the Inspector concluded (cf. para 22) that the previous application sought not to reuse a building but to replace one. As the 'existing dwelling' (the previous derelict caravan) has now been demolished, we fail to see how this planning application can be considered as an extension to an existing building and therefore must be considered as a replacement dwelling. The section below relates to planning Policy covering a replacement dwelling.
Outside Settlement Boundary and Contrary to Policy
The site is outside the recognised settlement boundary. The inspector also determined (cf. para 19) that Policy SB01 of the Crookham Village Parish Neighbourhood Plan (as made in 2021) (NP) also restricts development outside settlement boundaries to certain forms of development and that the previous proposals would fail to comply with the requirements of Policy SB01. The inspector concluded that (cf. para 21) "taken as a whole, the development plan does not support the principle of replacement dwellings outside settlement boundaries within Crookham Village Parish."
This application does not make a case why the policy (and the Inspector's decision on its application) should be disapplied for this new application.
No SANG Provision
There appears to be no SANG provision proposed within the application.
Inappropriate Development and Out of Character
The boxy square appearance of the proposed dwelling is clearly out of character for the area in which it is proposed as indeed are the two portacabins that are somehow currently on the site and these are not the basis on which to provide a dwelling that is sympathetic to the character of the street scene or its location close to the setting of the Crookham Village Conservation Area and Basingstoke Canal Conservation Area.
This is consistent with the reasons for rejection of previous proposals for a single dwelling on the site (cf. paras 30 to 33 of the Inspector's report).
Due to the size of the proposals, even more so if taken together, the overall floorspace of the new dwelling would be considerably greater than the cumulative floorspace of the previously existing 'dwelling'.
Therefore, the overall mass of built-form would be significantly greater. Moreover, it would be consolidated into one large building, rather than dispersed between two modest sized buildings that are notably distant from each other. Consequently, the new dwelling would reduce the openness of the site.
In conclusion we object to these applications for the reasons given above and urge them to be refused.
November 2023
17 Nov 2023 TWO NYASALAND APPEALS DISMISSED
Two appeals to the Planning Inspectorate for housing development at Nyasaland in Crookham Village have been dismissed.
The appeals were against Hart's decision to refuse the proposals for development of one 4-bedroom house (Ref 22/01510/FUL) and five 4-bedroom self-build houses (22/02794/OUT) on the site.
The decisions follow hearings in October.
The Inspector found that, although it has been agreed that the immediate location of the old caravan on the site can be regarded as Previously Developed Land (PDL), the designation does not apply to the site as a whole which remains agricultural in nature.
The Inspector also found insufficient justification for its replacement with a substantially larger building.
Importantly, the proposals fail to meet the policies in Hart's Local Plan (LP) and the more localised Crookham Village Neighbourhood Plan (NP) in a number of considerations.
Hart was not found to be deficient in providing sites for custom or self-build houses.
The proposal's benefits (allotments) do not outweigh the significant conflict with the housing strategy, the harm to the character and appearance of the area, the lack of affordable housing provision and harm to biodiversity.
The Inspector's decision can be found in detail at https://publicaccess.hart.gov.uk/online-applications/files/09B1637951B539032A9AF5D49EC82EBA/pdf/22_02794_OUT-3325419_APPEAL_DECISION-1781449.pdf
October 2023 Appeal against rejection of five houses and single house
Chartfield Homes have lodged an appeal against the rejection of recent applications.
An appeal hearing and site visit was held by the Planning Inspectorate on 17 October 2023 and a decision is pending.
May 2023 Planning Application for five houses rejected
Another new outline planning application for the development of housing at Nyasaland has been rejected by Hart.
This application (Hart Ref 22/02794/OUT) was submitted in November 2022 and was an outline application for the erection of five x 4-bedroom houses (self-build/custom build dwellings) with community allotments, parking and servicing. The existing barn structures and sheds would be removed to be replaced by 5 new houses, 15 allotments, and associated parking, with access from Crondall Road.
This application for five four-bedroom houses at Nyasaland was refused by Hart on 06 April 2023.
The main reasons for refusal were (in very summary form):
1. Located in open countryside outside the settlement boundary.
2. Urbanising effect on and does not enhance the landscape and is not sustainable.
3. Fails to provide for affordable homes.
4. No biodiversity information.
5. Does not meet Habitat Regulations.
Full report and decision at https://publicaccess.hart.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=RLHFFMHZGC000.
November 2022 Planning Application for five houses
An application (Hart Ref 22/02794/OUT) was submitted in November 2022 as an outline application for the erection of five x 4-bedroom houses (self-build/custom build dwellings) with community allotments, parking and servicing. The existing barn structures and sheds would be removed to be replaced by 5 new houses, 15 allotments, and associated parking, with access from Crondall Road.
Details of the proposals can be found on the Hart Planning Portal at https://publicaccess.hart.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=RLHFFMHZGC000
The proposal appeared to orient the building plots in different directions, although house designs would be determined by the self-builders, with a shared access point also shared with access to the allotments at the rear.
A number of public comments, including a comprehensive response by FACE IT, were provided in response to this application and Crookham Village Parish Council as a statutory consultee also raised objections.
The consultation period closed for comments on Friday 03 March 2023.
October 2022 Application for single house refused
The latest application was refused by Hart on 6th October 2022 on a similar basis to previous applications: in in open countryside outside the Crookham Village Settlement Boundary, would not positively contribute to the overall appearance of the area or respect or enhance ... the landscape, and would not result in sustainable development.
August 2022 Application for single house
Even while appeals for two other planning applications are pending, the developer has made yet another planning application for Nyasaland.
This is for a single 4-bedroom house and garage in front of where the barns are.
This is supposedly a 'replacement' for the uninhabitable caravan nearby.
The house appears similar to the previous proposal although the developer has tried to address some of the issues identified with the previous proposal, in that the ridge height is slightly reduced and the house would face the road rather than being side-on.
The site plan appears to show continued access to the barn structures and field.
The application appears to be confused as to whether a garage or open car port is proposed.
The same substantive issue of whether the caravan still qualifies as a dwelling will need to be decided by Hart and/or on appeal.
Ref 22/01510/FUL
Determination deadline 06 October.
August 2021 Application for single house
A further planning application under Hart Reference 21/01725/FUL has been made for erection of a four bedroom dwelling following demolition of existing buildings at Nyasaland, Crondall Road, Crookham Village. The access layout, siting and orientation of the property is modified from the previous application.
The previous application (21/00202/FUL) was refused by Hart in April although an appeal for that application is pending.
The property would lie opposite Martinique, Kingsmede and Rose Cottage close to the Exchequer PH.
Click here to view the planning application and make a comment - by no later than 11th August 2021.
December 2020 ‘Class Q’ application for conversion of one barn
On 22nd December 2020 Chartfield Homes made a further "Class Q" application (Hart Ref 20/03146/PRIOR) for conversion of one of the agricultural buildings to 3 dwelling houses.
This was proposed under the same regulation as the one in July which would bypass the normal planning process and automatically allow for conversion into dwellings.
As before, to qualify, this regulation requires that the building was solely in agricultural use on 20 March 2013. As before, several residents have commented that the building was also used for other purposes at that time.
Crookham Village Parish Council considered this application on 5th January 2021 and are recommending rejection to Hart.
FACE IT has also responded to Hart stating that for a number of reasons we do not feel able to support the application. Our response can be read in this link
The consultation period ended on 14 January and the application was due to be determined by 18 February 2021.
July 2020 ‘Class Q’ application for conversion of two barns
On 1st July 2020 Chartfield Homes made a "Class Q" application (Hart Ref 20/01535/PRIOR) for conversion of the agricultural buildings to 5 dwelling houses. This was proposed under the provision of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) -Schedule 2, Part 3, Class Q, which would bypass the normal planning process and automatically allow for conversion of existing agricultural buildings into up to 5 dwellings. To qualify, this regulation requires that the buildings were solely in agricultural use on 20 March 2013. Though not formally required, Hart sent notification letters to immediate neighbours. Several residents’ comments to Hart pointed out that the buildings were also used for other purposes at that time.
On the eve of determination on 27 August 2020 the "prior approval" application was withdrawn.